Blog

Insurance Bad Faith in California: What Business Owners Can Do When a Claim Is Wrongfully Denied

Posted by Pavel Kolmogorov | May 15, 2026 | 0 Comments

By Pavel Kolmogorov, California Business Litigation Attorney (State Bar No. 321018). Founder of Kolmogorov Law, P.C., recognized in Chambers and Partners 2026 Spotlight Guide for Litigation: General Commercial in Orange County. Last reviewed: May 2026.

You paid your premiums. You filed a legitimate claim. And the insurance company said no. For California business owners, a wrongful claim denial can be devastating—especially when the claim involves a lawsuit that requires an immediate defense or a property loss that demands urgent restoration. When an insurer unreasonably withholds benefits that are owed, California law provides powerful remedies that go well beyond the policy limits.

This guide explains the legal framework for insurance bad faith claims in California, the distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify, the elements of a bad faith cause of action, the damages available, and the practical steps business owners should take when facing a claim denial. Our insurance litigation practice page has additional context on the kinds of coverage disputes we handle.

The Duty to Defend vs. the Duty to Indemnify

Duty to defend. Under California law, an insurer's duty to defend is triggered whenever a lawsuit alleges facts that are potentially within the coverage of the policy. The key word is “potentially.” The insurer must look at the complaint and determine whether any alleged claim, if proven, could be covered. If so, the insurer must provide a defense—even if the majority of claims are not covered. This principle was established in Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co. (1966) 65 Cal.2d 263 and has been reaffirmed consistently by California courts.

Duty to indemnify. The duty to indemnify—the obligation to pay a judgment or settlement—is narrower. It applies only to claims that are actually covered by the policy. While the duty to defend is determined at the outset based on the allegations, the duty to indemnify is determined at the conclusion of the case based on the actual facts.

Why this matters: The duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify. An insurer that refuses to defend when the duty exists has breached the insurance contract and may be liable for all defense costs, any resulting judgment, and bad faith damages—even if the underlying claim would not ultimately have been covered.

What Is Insurance Bad Faith?

Insurance bad faith is a cause of action that arises when an insurer unreasonably withholds policy benefits. California recognizes two forms:

Breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (first-party bad faith). Every insurance contract in California includes an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The insurer breaches this covenant when it unreasonably delays or denies a claim, fails to conduct a thorough investigation, misrepresents policy provisions, or forces the insured to litigate to obtain benefits that are clearly owed. This claim arises in tort, meaning it supports damages beyond the policy limits, including emotional distress and punitive damages.

Third-party bad faith. When an insurer has a duty to defend and settle claims made by third parties against the insured, the insurer must act in the insured's best interest in handling those claims. An insurer that unreasonably refuses to settle within policy limits—exposing the insured to an excess judgment—may be liable for the entire judgment, including amounts exceeding the policy limits.

Common Examples of Bad Faith Conduct

  • Denying a claim without a reasonable investigation. The insurer issues a denial based on a superficial review without examining the relevant facts, documents, or policy provisions.
  • Unreasonable delay in processing a claim. California Insurance Code § 790.03(h) and the Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 10, § 2695.7) require insurers to accept or deny claims within 40 days of receiving proof of claim. Persistent, unexplained delays can constitute bad faith.
  • Lowball settlement offers. Offering an amount that is clearly inadequate based on the evidence of loss, hoping the insured will accept out of financial desperation.
  • Misrepresenting policy terms. Telling the insured that a loss is not covered when it is, or citing exclusions that do not apply to the facts of the claim.
  • Failing to provide a reasonable explanation for denial. Under Insurance Code § 790.03(h)(13), an insurer must provide a written explanation for any denial or reduction in benefits, including the specific policy provisions relied upon.
  • Refusing to defend a lawsuit. As discussed above, breaching the duty to defend is one of the most consequential forms of bad faith.

Damages in a Bad Faith Case

A successful bad faith claim can yield damages that far exceed the original policy benefits:

  • Policy benefits. The full amount of the benefits wrongfully withheld, plus interest.
  • Consequential damages. Financial losses caused by the denial—lost business income, additional expenses incurred, damage to credit or business relationships.
  • Emotional distress damages. Because bad faith is a tort claim, the insured can recover for emotional distress caused by the insurer's conduct. In business contexts, this is typically limited to individual owners and decision-makers rather than entities.
  • Punitive damages. If the insurer's conduct was fraudulent, oppressive, or malicious (Civ. Code § 3294), the insured can seek punitive damages. Punitive damages in insurance bad faith cases can be substantial—multiples of the compensatory damages—because they are designed to punish the insurer and deter future misconduct.
  • Attorney's fees. Under Brandt v. Superior Court (1985) 37 Cal.3d 813, an insured can recover attorney's fees incurred in obtaining the policy benefits as an element of tort damages in a bad faith action.

Steps to Take When Your Claim Is Denied

  1. Request the denial in writing. If the insurer communicates the denial verbally, demand a written explanation citing the specific policy provisions and factual bases for the denial. This is required under Insurance Code § 790.03(h)(13).
  2. Review the policy carefully. Read the relevant insuring agreement, definitions, conditions, and exclusions. Pay particular attention to whether the denial relies on an exclusion that may not apply to the actual facts of your claim.
  3. Document everything. Keep a detailed log of every communication with the insurer—dates, times, names of adjusters, and summaries of what was discussed. Save all correspondence.
  4. File a complaint with the California Department of Insurance. The CDI investigates complaints against insurers and can intervene on behalf of policyholders. Filing a complaint also creates a record of the insurer's conduct that can be used in subsequent litigation.
  5. Send a structured demand. Our guide to California demand letters covers what to include when escalating to the insurer in writing.
  6. Consult an insurance coverage attorney. Bad faith cases require specialized knowledge of insurance law, policy interpretation, and the regulatory framework. An experienced attorney can evaluate whether the denial is unreasonable and whether a bad faith claim is viable.

If filing suit becomes necessary, our civil trials in California primer walks through what to expect, and our civil litigation deadlines quick guide covers limitation periods.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How long does the insurance company have to respond to my claim?
A: Under the California Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 10, § 2695.7), an insurer must acknowledge receipt of a claim within 15 calendar days. After receiving a proof of claim, the insurer must accept or deny the claim within 40 calendar days. If additional time is needed, the insurer must provide written notice explaining the reasons for delay every 30 days.

Q: Can I sue my insurer for bad faith if they eventually pay the claim?
A: Potentially yes. If the delay was unreasonable and caused you damages (e.g., you had to borrow money at high interest rates, lost business, or suffered emotional distress), a bad faith claim may still be viable even if the insurer ultimately pays. Unreasonable delay in payment is itself a form of bad faith under California law.

Q: What if my insurer agreed to defend me but denied indemnity coverage?
A: This is a common situation called a defense under a reservation of rights. The insurer defends you against the lawsuit while reserving the right to later deny indemnity coverage. If you believe the claim is covered, you should consult your own attorney (separate from the insurer-appointed defense counsel) to monitor the coverage dispute and protect your interests.

Q: Are punitive damages really available against insurance companies?
A: Yes, and California juries have awarded significant punitive damages against insurers in bad faith cases. However, punitive damages require clear and convincing evidence that the insurer's conduct was oppressive, fraudulent, or malicious. A mere difference of opinion about coverage is typically insufficient; the denial must be unreasonable under the circumstances.

About the author

Pavel Kolmogorov is the founder of Kolmogorov Law, P.C., a California business-litigation boutique in Irvine. He earned his LL.M. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law and is licensed in California (SBN 321018), the District of Columbia, and the U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Southern, and Central Districts of California. He represents California businesses in breach of contract, fraud, UCL/B&P 17200, Penal Code 502, conversion, intentional and negligent interference, trade secrets, and partnership/shareholder disputes. Chambers and Partners 2026 recognized him in the Spotlight Guide for Litigation: General Commercial in Orange County.

This guide is general legal information, not legal advice for your specific situation. California law changes, and the facts of every dispute differ. To discuss how the principles in this article apply to your matter, contact our office at (909) 235-6116 or visit our contact page.

Need help? Contact Kolmogorov Law, P.C. at (909) 235-6116 or visit our contact page to schedule a consultation with our California business litigation team in Irvine, California.

About the Author

Pavel Kolmogorov

Senior Litigation Counsel │ [email protected]

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Kolmogorov Law Is Here for You

At Kolmogorov Law, we focus on Business Litigation, Civil Litigation, Real Estate Litigation, Employment Litigation, Judgment Enforcement, Product Liability, Construction Litigation and Professional Liability and we are here to listen to you and help you navigate the legal system.

Contact Us Today

Kolmogorov Law is committed to answering your questions about Business Litigation, Civil Litigation, Real Estate Litigation, Employment Litigation, Judgment Enforcement, Product Liability, Construction Litigation and Professional Liability issues in Irvine, California. We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.